O COMPORTAMENTO DOS CUSTOS INFLUENCIA A ACURÁCIA DE PREVISÃO DE RETORNOS?

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v26i2.1788

Resumo

A visão tradicional da contabilidade evidencia que os custos de uma entidade se ajustam proporcionalmente às alterações de volume, acompanhando, portanto, as oscilações dos níveis operacionais (Banker; Ciftci & Mashruwala, 2008). Por outro lado, as incertezas de demanda futura, as decisões de gestores sobre a alocação de recursos e o cenário macroeconômico contemporâneo, podem não ser mais explicados sob essa ótica. Implica-se na necessidade de outra perspectiva sobre o comportamento dos custos para elucidar o comportamento dos custos, considerando o seu reflexo frente às necessidades gerenciais das entidades (Novák; Dvorský; Popesko & Strouhal, 2017).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of

Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095

Banker, R. D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2008). Managerial optimism, prior period sales changes, and sticky cost behavior.

Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599284

Bushman, R. M., & Indjejikian, R. J. (1993). Accounting income, stock price, and managerial compensation. Journal of Accounting

and Economics, 16, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90003-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90003-X

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management,

(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Costa, L. B. (2025). Influência do cost stickiness na previsão de retornos em empresas abertas listadas na B3 (Tese de doutorado). Universidade

Federal de Uberlândia. https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2024.810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2024.810

Degenhart, L., Lunardi, M. A., Zonatto, V. C. S., & Dal Magro, C. B. (2021). Effect of financial restriction on sticky costs: Empirical

evidence from Brazil. Revista de Negócios, 26(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2021v26n1p6-21.

Fairfield, P. M., & Yohn, T. L. (2001). Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting

Studies, 6, 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430

Ghysels, E., Plazzi, A., & Valkanov, R. (2016). Why invest in emerging markets? The role of conditional return asymmetry. The

Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2145–2192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12420

Ibrahim, A. E. A., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2022). Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100439

future research agenda. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.

100439.

Kim, M., & Prather-Kinsey, J. (2010). An additional source of financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: Imperfect adjustments for

cost behavior. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500102

Medeiros, O. R., Costa, P. S., & Silva, C. A. T. (2005). Testes empíricos sobre o comportamento assimétrico dos custos nas empresas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772005000200005

brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 16(38), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S151970772005000200005.

Novák, P., Dvorský, J., Popesko, B., & Strouhal, J. (2017). Analysis of overhead cost behavior: Case study on decision-making

approach. Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/5

Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2002). Modeling sustainable earnings and P/E ratios with financial statement analysis. Social Science

Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318967

Pereira, N. A., & Tavares, M. (2020). Assimetria de custos no gerenciamento de resultados. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting,

(1). https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2020130106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2020130106

Pichetkun, N., & Panmanee, P. (2014). The determinants of sticky cost behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal

of Accounting Profession. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/6

Subramaniam, C., & Watson, M. W. (2016). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. Advances in Management Accounting,

, 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006

Tseng, C.-Y., Zhou, L., Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2022). Cost management and strings of increasing earnings. Open Journal of

Accounting, 11, 243–282. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.114013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.114013

Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/

accr.2010.85.4.1441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Publicado

2025-10-24

Como Citar

Brandão Costa, L., & Tavares, M. (2025). O COMPORTAMENTO DOS CUSTOS INFLUENCIA A ACURÁCIA DE PREVISÃO DE RETORNOS?. Revista Mineira De Contabilidade, 26(2), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v26i2.1788