DOES COST BEHAVIOR INFLUENCE THE ACCURACY OF RETURN FORECASTS?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v26i2.1788

Abstract

The traditional accounting perspective posits that an entity’s costs adjust proportionally to variations in volume, thereby tracking the fluctuations in operational levels (Banker; Ciftci & Mashruwala, 2008). Conversely, uncertainties related to future demand, managerial decisions concerning resource allocation, and the contemporary macroeconomic environment may no longer be adequately accounted for under this framework. This situation underscores the necessity for an alternative conceptualization of cost behavior to more accurately elucidate cost dynamics, taking into consideration their implications for the managerial requirements of organizations (Novák; Dvorský; Popesko & Strouhal, 2017).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of

Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095

Banker, R. D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2008). Managerial optimism, prior period sales changes, and sticky cost behavior.

Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599284

Bushman, R. M., & Indjejikian, R. J. (1993). Accounting income, stock price, and managerial compensation. Journal of Accounting

and Economics, 16, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90003-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90003-X

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management,

(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Costa, L. B. (2025). Influência do cost stickiness na previsão de retornos em empresas abertas listadas na B3 (Tese de doutorado). Universidade

Federal de Uberlândia. https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2024.810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2024.810

Degenhart, L., Lunardi, M. A., Zonatto, V. C. S., & Dal Magro, C. B. (2021). Effect of financial restriction on sticky costs: Empirical

evidence from Brazil. Revista de Negócios, 26(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2021v26n1p6-21.

Fairfield, P. M., & Yohn, T. L. (2001). Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting

Studies, 6, 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012430513430

Ghysels, E., Plazzi, A., & Valkanov, R. (2016). Why invest in emerging markets? The role of conditional return asymmetry. The

Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2145–2192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12420

Ibrahim, A. E. A., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2022). Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100439

future research agenda. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.

100439.

Kim, M., & Prather-Kinsey, J. (2010). An additional source of financial analysts’ earnings forecast errors: Imperfect adjustments for

cost behavior. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500102

Medeiros, O. R., Costa, P. S., & Silva, C. A. T. (2005). Testes empíricos sobre o comportamento assimétrico dos custos nas empresas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772005000200005

brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 16(38), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S151970772005000200005.

Novák, P., Dvorský, J., Popesko, B., & Strouhal, J. (2017). Analysis of overhead cost behavior: Case study on decision-making

approach. Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/5

Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2002). Modeling sustainable earnings and P/E ratios with financial statement analysis. Social Science

Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318967

Pereira, N. A., & Tavares, M. (2020). Assimetria de custos no gerenciamento de resultados. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting,

(1). https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2020130106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2020130106

Pichetkun, N., & Panmanee, P. (2014). The determinants of sticky cost behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal

of Accounting Profession. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/6

Subramaniam, C., & Watson, M. W. (2016). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. Advances in Management Accounting,

, 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006

Tseng, C.-Y., Zhou, L., Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2022). Cost management and strings of increasing earnings. Open Journal of

Accounting, 11, 243–282. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.114013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.114013

Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/

accr.2010.85.4.1441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Published

2025-10-24

How to Cite

Brandão Costa, L., & Tavares, M. (2025). DOES COST BEHAVIOR INFLUENCE THE ACCURACY OF RETURN FORECASTS?. Revista Mineira De Contabilidade, 26(2), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v26i2.1788