ESG PERFORMANCE, RISK AND THE (IN)EXISTENCE OF A RISK COMMITTEE IN BRAZILIAN COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v24i3.1520Keywords:
ESG, Market risk, Risk committeeAbstract
This study seeks to o analyze the relationship between ESG performance and market risk in Brazilian companies. In order to achieve this objective, data from the Economática® and Refinitiv® databases of 73 companies listed on B3 stock exchange, with a total of 365 observations for the 2017-2021 period. Descriptive statistics, voice analysis, Mann-Whitney mean difference test, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and models were estimated Ordinary Least Squares with robust coefficients and standard errors for heteroscedasticity and using Generalized Least Squares for panel data. The descriptive analysis indicates that the companies have better performance in the social and governance aspect, when compared to the environmental aspect. The results of the mean difference test indicate that a risk committee in companies implies higher means for ESG performance, environmental, social and governance performance when there were executives who do not have this advisory body to the board of directors. As for MCA, there were correlations between low ESG scores for companies that do not have a risk committee. The results of the regression analysis indicate that ESG performance and social performance affect workers and market risk. The present study has a contribution of supporting companies, market agents and the scientific community, as in the Brazilian capital market, companies concerned with maintaining high ESG performance scores tend to take less risks.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, W. N., & Said, R. (2019). Audit and risk committee in financial crime prevention. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 223-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2017-0116
Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020
Aldhamari, R., Nor, M. N. M., Boudiab, M., & Mas' ud, A. (2020). The impact of political connection and risk committee on corporate financial performance: evidence from financial firms in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1281-1305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2020-0122
Amorim, A. L. G. C., Lima, I. S., & Murcia, F. D. R. (2012). Análise da relação entre as informações contábeis e o risco sistemático no mercado brasileiro. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 23, 199-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772012000300005
Benlemlih, M., & Girerd‐Potin, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: on the moderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(7-8), 1137-1166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12251
Bergamini, S., Junior (2021). ESG, impactos ambientais e contabilidade. Pensar Contábil, 23(80), 46-54.
Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Cheema, M. A., & Man, Y. (2020). Risk committee, corporate risk-taking and firm value. Managerial Finance, 4(3), 285-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2019-0322
Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258-1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.004
Bravo, F., & Reguera‐Alvarado, N. (2019). Sustainable development disclosure: environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 418-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2258
Capelli, P., Ielasi, F., & Russo, A. (2021). Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1483-1495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2180
Chang, K., Kim, I., & Li, Y. (2014). The heterogeneous impact of corporate social responsibility activities that target different stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 211-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1895-8
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131
Chollet, P., & Sandwidi, B. W. (2018). CSR engagement and financial risk: A virtuous circle? International evidence. Global Finance Journal, 38, 65-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.03.004
Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment valuation: tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. 2. ed. Willey Finance.
Dandaro, F. M., & Lima, F. G. (2022). ESG performance and credit risk in Latin America. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 17(3), 40-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v0i0.53433
Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of sustainability. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: the moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Fiório, S. L., Nossa, S. N., Costa, R. A., Pereira, A. N., & Nossa, V. (2008). A responsabilidade social corporativa nos informes empresariais do setor de telecomunicações: uma análise exploratória e documental. Contabilidade Gestão e Governança, 11(1-2), 279-295.
Fiordelisi, F., Ricci, O., & Santilli, G. (2022). Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: evidence from the European banking industry. Recuperado em dezembro, 28, 2022, em https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4167115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4167115
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269860.001.0001
Girerd-Potin, I., Jimenez-Garcès, S., & Louvet, P. (2014). Which dimensions of social responsibility concern financial investors?. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 559-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1731-1
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.750
Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: a contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28, 301-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria básica. 11. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH.
Inderst, G., & Stewart, F. (2018). Incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into fixed income investment. World Bank Group publication, April. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175830
Korinth, F., & Lueg, R. (2022). Corporate sustainability and risk management – the u-shaped relationships of disaggregated ESG rating scores and risk in the German capital market. Sustainability, 14(9), 5735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095735
Lameira, V. D. J., Ness Jr, W. L., Quelhas, O. L. G., & Pereira, R. G. (2013). Sustentabilidade, valor, desempenho e risco no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 15, 76-90.
Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119
Lueg, K., Krastev, B., & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.379
Malik, M. F., Nowland, J., & Buckby, S. (2021). Voluntary adoption of board risk committees and financial constraints risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 101611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101611
Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., & Abidin, S. (2015). The impact of corporate environmental performance on market risk: the Australian industry case. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 347-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2324-3
ONU. Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Recuperado em outubro, 6, 2022, em https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs.
Peixoto, F. M., Pains, M. B., Araújo, A. A., & Guimarães, T. M. (2016). Custo de capital, endividamento e sustentabilidade empresarial: um estudo no mercado de capitais brasileiro no período de 2009 a 2013. Race: Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia, 15(1), 39-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18593/race.v15i1.6281
Refinitiv (2022). Environmental, social and governance scores from Refinitiv. Recuperado em agosto, 25, 2023, em https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf?utm_campaign=443870_2021GlobalSustainableFinanceESG&elqCampaignId=13827&utm_source=Perspectives&utm_medium=Blog&utm_term=ESGScores
Refinitiv. (2015). Environmental, social and governance performance. Recuperado em outubro, 6, 2022, em http://thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/corporate-responsibility-inclusion/esg-performance.html.
Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3
Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Shi, Y., Bao, J., & Ren, Y. (2019, July). BRI cooperation: mainstreaming ESG investments. Green Belt and Road Initiative Center. Recuperado em dezembro 4, 2022, em https://green-bri.org/bri-cooperation-mainstreaming-esg-investments/.
Silva, B. S., Queiroz, J. N., Francisco, J. R. S., Silva, R. C. (2021). Ações adotadas pelas empresas da B3 alinhadas com os 17 Objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável (ODS): uma análise dos relatórios de sustentabilidade. Revista Mineira de Contabilidade, 22(2), 37-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v22i2.1217
Sridharan, V. (2018). Bridging the disclosure gap: investor perspectives on environmental, social & governance (ESG) disclosures. Social & Governance (ESG) Disclosures, May 11, 2018. Master of Environmental Studies Capstone Projects. 72. Recuperado em dezembro, 28, 2022, em https://repository.upenn.edu/mes_capstones/72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180412
Srivastav, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Corporate governance and bank risk-taking. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 334-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12133
Tao, N. B., & Hutchinson, M. (2013). Corporate governance and risk management: the role of risk management and compensation committees. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 9(1), 83-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.03.003
Teixeira, E. A., Nossa, V., & Funchal, B. (2011). O índice de sustentabilidade empresarial (ISE) e os impactos no endividamento e na percepção de risco. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 22, 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772011000100003
Vello, A. P. C., & Martinez, A. L. (2014). Planejamento tributário eficiente: uma análise de sua relação com o risco de mercado. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 11(23), 117-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2014v11n23p117
Yu, E. P. Y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Zhang, C., Gao, L., Wang, W., Chen, X., & An, J. (2023). Do ESG scores have incremental information value on the primary bond market? evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1051000
Zhao, Y., Elahi, E., Khalid, Z., Sun, X., & Sun, F. (2023). Environmental, social and governance performance: analysis of CEO power and corporate risk. Sustainability, 15(2), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021471
Zucchi, C. V. O., Brugni, T. V., Nossa, S. N., & Beiruth, A. X. (2021). Mulheres no conselho de administração e o risco da firma. Revista Mineira de Contabilidade, 22(1), 13-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v22i1.1145
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alessandra Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Francisca Yasmin de Aguiar Guedes, Daniel Barboza Guimarães, Fernanda Beatryz Rolim Tavares
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. Essa licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho para fins não comerciais, desde que atribuam a você o devido crédito e que licenciem as novas criações sob termos idênticos.
b) Não cabe aos autores compensação financeira a qualquer título, por artigos ou resenhas publicados na Revista Mineira de Contabilidade.
c) Os conceitos expressos nos artigos publicados pela RMC são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional
